So, Natania Barron from The Aldersgate Cycle posted something that sparked a question in my head. One that I have danced over before in a moment of casual curiosity, but never looked into deeply. Namely, ‘- do we write what we are? If so, who are you?’
Now, I know that from experience I tend to write nothing like what we — or I — am. My imagination is bored with the everyday life of an Englishmen in America. Indeed, it’s even bored with the notion of the human race as it is and whatever it may, or may not have given us. My mind seeks to conjure up anything and everything, and often things that are so far removed from reality that even it (and consequently me) gets confused by it’s own plethora of thoughts and mutant-creations.
I have bounced from Neo-London futures to dying universes, from Kings and Queens of made-up realms to Angelic societies battling one another in post-apocalyptic, mechanised worlds (the latter of which is to be the basis — and thesis — for my NaNoWriMo attempt).
But back to the question at hand; writing what we are, and who we may be if this is the case. Now, I took this question in a religious context. I am not religious: I have two children, a wife and two cats, but I believe in nothing, I follow no faith. That is not to say there is nothing out there, but the fallible nature of man leads me to conclude that we can never be certain that that something is indeed out there. We are not omnipotent, or omnipresent therefore how can we ever know?
This is not an argument however, as an agnostic (as I have considered myself to be for many years) I do not protest the existance of something beyond our reality, be it samsara, heaven or anything in-between. I just don’t have enough evidence or a small enough doubt that we cannot, truly, know.
So, do I write what we are? No. Does this tell me who I am? Yes. At present, I am writing the foundation for Arbiture which will be my NaNoWriMo entry. I cannot truly describe it in simple terms, but to sum it up: it is about two angelic races from different realms of existance, converging at a point where their own balance of suffering and enlightenment causes the realm they inhabit to implode, causing a visceral-ethereal war in the process… I told you it’s not simple to ‘blurb’.
The nature of the story lends itself to Judo-Christian beliefs played out on Buddhist stage — reading that back gives me cause to raise an eyebrow in scepticism. What have I gotten myself into? I am questioning faith, the nature of sacrifice, a life of suffering and a life of angelic pride and divination, and what might happen should these two cornerstones of separate existences collide. There is also love vs. faith, passion vs. doubt and some inter-realm travel for good measure (or plains of existence if you like) and I’m not even religious!
What the fuck am I thinking?
The answer, it came to me simply, is that I like to present myself and my doubts with what others see as their truths. What better way to answer one’s own questions than to look into a mirror, or walk in another’s shoes. I imagine my mind chose this in some subconscious way. I am intrigued, but do not believe and as such my imagination has sought to throw these two things together in some kind of Cage Fight.
It’s fascinating — to me at least — to loom beyond what I once thought was a cool vision in my mind’s eye and to discover there is so much more behind it. There are questions, and maybe even some answers in the things I write. For me that makes it even more fulfilling to do.




