WBM: Arbiture — The Story">WBM: Arbiture — The Story


I realise I have ideas, and some­what of a sturdy frame­work when it comes down to what I have cre­ated (and con­tinue to cre­ate) dur­ing this world build­ing month. I think I have a good real­i­sa­tion of where I am going — and who will take us there. I have a world (or three), a strong founded race to turn and spin on my stage and enough grip on my uni­verse to tweak my mar­i­onettes with confidence.

So why then, do I not know how I am get­ting there? There is a path in-front of me, but I’m not sure what means of trans­port to ride down it (metaphors, metaphors). A large part of the approach I am hav­ing with this is some­what hinged on motion-creationism, which is a fancy way of say­ing I’m mak­ing it up as I go along. But what’s new there, right? Espe­cially with me.

This I can han­dle, it’s my way. The chief prob­lem — if you want to call it that — is my choice on what this all means. I have a gen­eral thought that repeats itself and tells me is the mean­ing of my story and in the end, it will be so. This leaves me with being cau­tious in how to approach what will appar­ently be inevitable.

It reminds me of the wing-loss ques­tion: how does a race such as the Angelus loose their wings? An answer based on logic would be a fun­da­men­tally strong foun­da­tion, but would it be the best answer? I’m not talk­ing twists and shock-value. I’m talk­ing about what would really be the ulti­mate answer that would irrev­o­ca­bly lead to such con­se­quence and glean such a les­son in the end (not a ques­tion, but a state­ment of the rea­son behind my indecision).

I think it was Stephen King, who said some­thing regard­ing his char­ac­ters lead­ing his story. Don’t plot — in so many words, he said in On Writ­ing, but let events unfold. He has a point, and way of look­ing at writ­ing that I agree with. It might not be some­thing I am faced with daily, but it is the way I feel com­fort­able approach­ing my own writ­ing. I have to have some idea of what is hap­pen­ing, why it’s hap­pen­ing and what may be the out­come… but that doesn’t mean I have to plan every scene and what it will entail.

At present, I’m not overly con­cerned with this issue. It will resolve itself in time and for now, I think I can focus on mov­ing for­ward and putting things down on paper. If I start at the begin­ning and walk steadily — keep­ing an eye out for sign­posts — I think I’ll find my way.

Inci­den­tally, I think I’m going to enter NaNoW­riMo. I think I’ll use this as an oppor­tu­nity to ham­mer out my story of the Fallen and their Angelus kin. Should I keep the inter­est and intrigue of this all in my head, I may be able to actu­ally turn this roller-coaster of a ride into a well-rounded vehi­cle for suc­cess (you can ‘buddy’ me here).

(Image: Imbal­anced — Viviphyd)

  • note­nough­words

    I’m not a pantser per­son­ally; I like to have a nice out­line of where my plot is going. But those scenes are still built on the moti­va­tions and needs of my char­ac­ters, and they can change at any time. But if pants­ing works for you, go for it. Every­one writes differently.

    Good luck with Nano!

  • Alex Moore

    I like your aware­ness of your own style and pref­er­ences — as well as the fact that you seem will­ing to exper­i­ment a lit­tle, too. I’ve exper­i­mented with both (allow­ing char­ac­ters to drive the action & allow­ing the plot to guide the char­ac­ters), and I find that — in my best writ­ing, at least — some­where there’s this bizarre inter­sec­tion where it all tan­gles beau­ti­fully. So, that’s what I shoot for: a loosely built (mean­ing flex­i­ble) story arc & strong char­ac­ters who know what they want.

    I am look­ing for­ward to read­ing your first cou­ple of chap­ters, if you’ll allow me, some time. You’ve done an excel­lent job of set­ting mood sim­ply through your use of imagery. (& yes, I’m one of those hor­rid peo­ple who check out/buy books based on the cover…) any­way, good luck!

  • RG Sanders

    I com­pletely under­stand, Mer­rilee. To think that no scenes are built upon the pre­dis­po­si­tion of a char­ac­ter and their actions (even before they have com­mit­ted them) would be overly narrow-sighted.

    I think a bal­ance is what I’m aim­ing for, much as Alex said. One where your for­ward motion con­nects with the web of the story and it explodes onto the page.

    Thank you Alex, for your kind words. As men­tioned many times pre­vi­ously, I have tried my hand in both ways and this is how I have come to realise my own style.

    I have been told in the past that I have a cer­tain style of writ­ing, but I think over­work­ing the foun­da­tion has caused me to become routed in a way I don’t write. Thus I changed.

    And thank you for the inter­est! I really do appre­ci­ate that. To know some­one (other than my wife) would read some­thing I have writ­ten — or take inter­est before I have shown it — helps my con­fi­dence no end.

  • Steph

    I’m going to enter NaNoW­riMo with the world idea I’m build­ing now as well (prob­a­bly) and I know exactly what you mean about plot­ting. Right now I’m at the same spot. Got the world, got the char­ac­ters, got the end. But other than that, I’ve got nothing.

    I do like Stephen King’s idea of just let­ting things unfold. I think I’ll end up with major plot holes that way, but hey, most of writ­ing is rewrit­ing any­ways, right?

  • RG Sanders

    I can’t imag­ine who might write their first draft on the first approach. That would be something…

    The last cou­ple of days I’ve been think­ing a lot about a story that might present itself and slowly some­thing is com­ing together. I’m glad to have it com­ing to me, instead of chalk­ing it all out by force.

    Good look with Cres Chen­cia and NaNoWriMo ;)